When it comes to building a strong board of directors, I am a firm believer in term limits that not only limit the term but also limit the renewal of terms – such as a three-year term with a limit of two consecutive terms. This way, a board member is unable to serve more than six consecutive years without having a “break” from the board.
Opponents believe that this could result in the loss of exceptional board members putting the organization at a disadvantage. However, I feel there are other ways to engage that “exceptional board member” and after a year, if there is a vacant position on the board and the board approves it, that member could rejoin the board of directors.
Change is inevitable – change in our communities, change in people, change in expertise, and change in the way business is conducted. To embrace change, the board composition may need to change as well. Vitality of the board, and therefore the organization, is closely tied to bringing in new people and fresh perspectives, while also having a certain amount of continuity. In other words, the best models include scattered terms so that there is a mix of new and seasoned board members. What is your thought on this topic? What advantages or disadvantages do you see with term limits? What are some ways to effectively implement term limits if it’s something new for a long-standing organization?
Kathy Grochow, Nonprofit Resource Specialist, St. Cloud
No comments:
Post a Comment